Legal Opinion

In Re Deeren

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1987No. Docket 93946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Dawn Deeren appeals as of right from the probate court’s order terminating her parental rights regarding April Dawn Deeren. We affirm.

Respondent first claims that the trial court clearly erred when it terminated her parental rights under MGL 712A.19a(e); MSA 27.3178(598.19a)(e). Respondent claims that the court terminated her parental rights too quickly and did not consider respondent’s changed circumstances. Having reviewed the entire record in this case, we cannot say that the probate court clearly erred when it terminated respondent’s parental rights. In re Cornet, 422 Mich 274;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re CornetMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re RinesmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In Re BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In Re AdriansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF AZ. v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilart Associates v. Kapiolani Plaza, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Petto v. the Raymond Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API