Legal Opinion
Konecranes, Inc. v. Scott Sinclair
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 5, 2004No. CV 03-1782-PAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Konecranes, Inc., dba Crane Pro Services, Inc. (“Konecranes”) brings this diversity action against defendants Scott Sinclair and Service Crane, LLC. On December 30, 2003, following a hearing, I denied Plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order. This opinion explains that ruling.
Background
Plaintiff manufactures and services construction cranes, and supplies spare parts. Konecranes has “over 65 locations across the United States,” plus Canada, Mexico, Europe, and Asia. See…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Bob Gilder, Ken Green, John Inman, Rafe Botts v. Pga Tour, Inc., a Maryland Nonprofit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brinton Business Ventures, Inc. v. SearleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Commercial Fire Protection, LLC v. PiggDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Dennis' Seven Dees Landscaping, Inc. v. PickettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Hosick v. Catalyst IT Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Isosceles Holdings, LLC v. Alliance Environmental Group LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.