Legal Opinion

Newman v. DCSE/Eva Durkin

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 20, 1995No. Nos. 393, 1995, 394, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

These consolidated appeals arise from two separate petitions for writs of habeas corpus — one filed in the Superior Court and the other in the Family Court. Each seeks to *10test the legality of the incarceration of the appellant, James L. Newman, who is currently imprisoned for civil contempt upon order of the Family Court. Newman, appearing pro se, contends he is entitled to pursue a writ of habeas corpus in the Superi- or Court to test the legality of his incarceration by the Family Court. The State, appearing on behalf of the Division of Child Support Enforcement, which initiated the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gannett Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. In Re Justice of the Peace PittSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Mummert v. WigginSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of CantrellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API