Legal Opinion

Mummert v. Wiggin

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 28, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The preliminary question we address is the finality for appellate purposes of an order of the Court of Chancery, denominated a “Final Order and Judgment” (the order), granting an injunction to the plaintiffs. The defendants have appealed, but no stay has been issued or a supersede-as bond posted. Among other rulings, the trial court specifically retained jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the injunction. In the absence of a stay, a court of equity retains inherent power to enforce its injunctions during the pendency of an appeal or at any other time. Thus, if the order was intended to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stroud v. Milliken Entersprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. J. I. Kislak Mortgage Corp. v. William Matthews, Builder, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Farmhand, Inc. v. Anel Engineering Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Diversified Growth Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Aetos Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Newman v. DCSE/Eva DurkinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API