Legal Opinion
Bastendorf v. Arndt
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1939No. Docket No. 128, Calendar No. 40,671PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.
The question herein presented is whether the erection by defendant of a building in Windmill Pointe Subdivision, Detroit, to be used for a school of dance and drama, is a violation of a restriction, the pertinent part of which is as follows:
“On all lots fronting on Alter road * * * no building shall be erected on any lots, except a single house, a double house, or a duplex flat. * * * Schools and churches or other public buildings may be constructed on lots numbered 133 to 174, both inclusive, in which case the restrictions in this paragraph do not apply.”
The stipulated facts indicate that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Detroit Home & Day School v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Phillips v. LawlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Kelly v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cooper v. KovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Borowski v. WelchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- BOYS'CLUBS OF DETROIT v. PakulaMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re Nordwood Estates SubdivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- National Schools v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.