Legal Opinion

BOYS'CLUBS OF DETROIT v. Pakula

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1955No. Docket 36, Calendar 46,323PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Three questions are presented in the appeal of defendant and appellant Benny J. Pakula:(1) Was the southeast corner of Michigan and Military avenues, where appellant Benny J. Pakula sought to operate a bar under a class “C” liquor license, less than 500 feet from the Boys’ Club of Detroit?(2) Was the Boys’ Club of Detroit a “school” within the meaning of section 17a of the liquor control act * which provides “any request to transfer location of an existing license, shall be denied in the event the contemplated location is within 500 feet of a church or a school building” ? and(3) Does laches…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Langbein v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Morse v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bastendorf v. ArndtMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Matter of TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MISSISSIPPI STATE TAX COM'N v. Package Store, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Big Bear Markets of Michigan, Inc. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Surowitz v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. DeJongeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Thacker v. CrowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API