Legal Opinion

Perry v. Zaring

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1946No. Civ. No. 15516PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

On June 15, 1945, appellant Perry, as a friend of Kate A. Zaring, an incompetent, filed a petition for the latter’s restoration to capacity. After trial by jury, wherein respondent Hanson H. Zaring, as guardian of the incompetent, resisted said petition, a verdict was returned finding Kate A. Zaring to be a competent person and judgment on the verdict was duly entered restoring said incompetent to capacity and mental competency. Thereafter respondent guardian moved for a new trial on the grounds: “ (1) That the verdict is contrary to the law; (2) That the verdict is contrary to the evidence;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of ZaringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API