Perry v. Zaring
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
On June 15, 1945, appellant Perry, as a friend of Kate A. Zaring, an incompetent, filed a petition for the latter’s restoration to capacity. After trial by jury, wherein respondent Hanson H. Zaring, as guardian of the incompetent, resisted said petition, a verdict was returned finding Kate A. Zaring to be a competent person and judgment on the verdict was duly entered restoring said incompetent to capacity and mental competency. Thereafter respondent guardian moved for a new trial on the grounds: “ (1) That the verdict is contrary to the law; (2) That the verdict is contrary to the evidence;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of ZaringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948