FN Herstal SA v. Clyde Armory Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COOGLER, District Judge:
This trademark infringement action arises out of the parties’ use of the marks “SCAR” and “SCAR-Stock” in the firearms industry. Appellant Clyde Armory Inc. (“Clyde Armory”) appeals the district court’s partial grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee FN Herstal SA (“FN”), its grant of FN’s motion to strike Clyde Armory’s jury demand, its denial of Clyde Armory’s motion to amend the proposed pretrial order, and its entry of judgment against Clyde Armory following a bench trial. After careful review of the record and briefs of the parties, and having the benefit…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Conagra, Inc., a Corporation v. Robert C. Singleton, an Individual, D/B/A Singleton Shrimp Boats, Singleton Shrimp Boats, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Welding Services, Inc. v. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. American Cinema Editors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Hard Candy, LLC v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Converse, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Todd v. CarstarphenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Underwood v. Bank of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.