Legal Opinion
Adhikari v. Daoud & Partners
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 3, 2009No. 5:09-po-01237PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”, Doc. No. 58) filed by Defendants Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.; Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.; KBR, Inc.; KBR Holdings, LLC; Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC; KBR Technical Services, Inc.; Kellogg Brown & Root International, Inc.; Service Employees International, Inc.; and Overseas Administration Services, Ltd. (“KBR” collectively) (Doc. No. 138). For the following reasons, KBR’s Motion must be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
For…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Velez v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- McPeters v. EdwardsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. BenhamouDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Magnifico v. VillanuevaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Doe v. Nestle, S.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.