Bigheart Pipeline Corp. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRETT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by defendant United States of America and defendant Core Energy, Inc. A hearing on the motions has been held. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment of Core Energy, Inc., is overruled and the motion for summary judgment of the United States of America is sustained.
This is an interpleader action filed by Bigheart Pipe Line Corporation, the purchaser of oil runs from the “Hammer K” lease in Mayes County, Oklahoma, to determine entitlement to proceeds from the oil…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mike Bruce v. Martin-Marietta Corporation and Ozark Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Frank Oil Co. v. Belleview Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wessel v. United States (In Re Wessel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- Vance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- In Re BlackerbyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- United States v. MoreyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993
- United States v. SolheimCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.