Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Santo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 20, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 6, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was not totally unemployed during the period he was collecting unemployment insurance benefits. The record establishes that during the relevant time period claimant was the sole shareholder and an officer of a laundry business. Although claimant’s activities were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of FirschingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re the Claim of WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AlmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of JefferyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API