In re the Claim of Santo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 6, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was not totally unemployed during the period he was collecting unemployment insurance benefits. The record establishes that during the relevant time period claimant was the sole shareholder and an officer of a laundry business. Although claimant’s activities were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of FirschingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Claim of AlmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of JefferyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001