Legal Opinion

McGrew v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1963No. 10469PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting a directed verdict for defendant, respondent here, Consolidated Freightways.

The action was brought by plaintiff and appellant against two defendants, Harley Peet and his employer, Consolidated Freightways, to recover damages for an assault and battery.

Hereinafter plaintiff and appellant will be referred to as plaintiff, the defendant and respondent Consolidated Freight-ways as Consolidated and the defendant Harley Peet as Peet.

Plaintiff worked for Consolidated, his duties included hustling trucks, i. e., backing trucks to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Nicholson v. Roundup Coal Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. FriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jablonski v. MultackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Elliott v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rachel-Smith v. FTData, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  4. Schatz v. York Steak House Systems, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Hensley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API