Legal Opinion
State v. General Motors Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1983PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eugene R. Wolin, J.
In 1979, in response to numerous consumer complaints, the Attorney-General initiated an investigation of the Turbo-Hydra-Matic 200 Transmission (THM 200), a component installed in various models of General Motors (GM) automobiles. GM began to equip its automobiles with the THM 200 in 1976 and the transmission was covered by GM’s new-car limited warranty against defects appearing during the first 12 months or 12,000 miles, whichever *372came first.1 The investigation of the Attorney-General was based upon an analysis of approximately 1,600 consumer…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- 219 Broadway Corp. v. Alexander's, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- De Sole v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Woods v. Maytag Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Martin Hilti Family Trust v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.