Legal Opinion

Zolotar v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ross, J.

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether plaintiffs employment with defendant was terminable at will.

On October 16, 1953, Mr. Seymour Zolotar joined New York Life Insurance Company (New York Life) as an apprentice underwriter, and thereafter, pursuant to a written agreement, executed on or about April 16, 1954, with New York Life, he became a soliciting agent.

It is undisputed that this agreement, entitled soliciting agent’s contract (contract), authorized Mr. Zolotar, as a field underwriter, to solicit applications for various insurance policies issued…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kathryn M. Longo v. Shore & Reich, Ltd. Advest, Inc., and Gerald I. ReichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Skillgames v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Buckman v. CALYON SECURITIES (USA) INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Gomez v. BicknellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Ullmann v. Norma Kamali, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API