Legal Opinion

Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. v. Hazels

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1889PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Pawnee comity. Heard below before Appelget, J. cited: Pa. B. Go. v. Lippincott, 3*0 Am. & Eng. R. R, Cases, 399; Hammersmith, eta., Go. v. Brand, L. R. 4 H. L. 171; Republican Valley R. R. Go. v. Linn, 15 Neb. 234; Rorer on Railroads, p. 33, and authorities cited; Gottschalk v. G. B. & Q. B. B Go., 14 Neb. 550, 560; Hatch v. Vt. Cent. B. B. Go., 25 Vt. 49-64; Pittsburg & Lake Hie B. B. Co. v. Jones, 111 Pa.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the district court of Pawnee comity. Heard below before Appelget, J. cited: Pa. B. Go. v. Lippincott, 3*0 Am. & Eng. R. R, Cases, 399; Hammersmith, eta., Go. v. Brand, L. R. 4 H. L. 171; Republican Valley R. R. Go. v. Linn, 15 Neb. 234; Rorer on Railroads, p. 33, and authorities cited; Gottschalk v. G. B. & Q. B. B Go., 14 Neb. 550, 560; Hatch v. Vt. Cent. B. B. Go., 25 Vt. 49-64; Pittsburg & Lake Hie B. B. Co. v. Jones, 111 Pa. St. 204; Begina «, The Metropolitan Board of Works, 3 B. & S. 710; Chase-more v. Richards, 7 H. L. Ch. 349; Picket v. The Metropolitan By. Go., L. R. 2 H.…

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Pawnee county, by defendant in error, and against plaintiff in error, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by defendant in error to the north half of block thirty-five, in that part of Pawnee City known as North Pawnee City,'by the construction of plaintiff’s railroad along the north side of Third street, which is abutting on and north of defendant’s property.

The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant in error. Plaintiff in error seeks review by proceedings in error.

It appears from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Gottschalk v. C., B. & Q. R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Chicago, Saint Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. LundstromNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. ReinhackleNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Blakeley v. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska RailwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Jaynes v. Omaha Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Omaha & N. P. R. v. JanecekNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Root v. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Mason City & Ft. D. R. v. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API