Legal Opinion

Blakeley v. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to the di,strict court for Thayer county. Tried below before Morris, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Oh. J.

This was an appeal to the district court of Thayer county from an award of damages to real estate resulting from the construction of the railroad of defendant in error over and across such real estate.

The questions presented by plaintiff in error will be-considered in their order.

During the trial,. Nathan Blakeley was sworn as a witness on the part of the plaintiff in error, and was asked the following questions:

Q,. For what purpose was this land adapted prior to. the taking of it by the railroad?

A. For agricultural purposes. It was not under cultivation.

Q. It could have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republican Valley Railroad v. ArnoldNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Harrison v. Iowa Midland R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Republican Valley R. R. v. LinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wahlgren v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Medelman v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Omaha & N. P. R. v. JanecekNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BuelNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API