Legal Opinion

Drobny v. Lanham

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 15, 2017No. 16-3511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In an Illinois federal court, Sheldon Drobny sued Randall Lanham and M. Richard Cutler, both out-of-state attorneys, for their conduct during the second of two corporate mergers. The attorneys moved to dismiss the suit for lack of personal jurisdiction, and the district court granted the motion. It reasoned that Drob-ny did not allege that his injuries arose from any of the attorneys’ forum-related activities. On appeal Drobny argues that the district court erred because, he says, his emails and telephone calls from Illinois to the attorneys, mentioned in his complaint, establish…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. HagermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walls v. VRE Chi. Eleven, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Walls v. VRE Chicago Eleven, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API