Legal Opinion
United States v. Hagerman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 26, 2008No. 08-2670PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The defendants were convicted of criminal violations of the Clean Water Act, and Wabash was ordered to pay $250,000 in restitution to a federal Superfund account and was placed on probation (18 U.S.C. § 3563) for five years. Corporate probation has been called “a flexible vehicle for imposing a wide range of sanctions having the common feature of continued judicial control over aspects of corporate conduct.” Richard Gruner, “To Let the Punishment Fit the Organization: Sanctioning Corporate Offenders Through Corporate Probation,” 16 Am. J.Crim. L. 1, 3 (1988); see also…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eagle Associates v. Bank of MontrealCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Scandia Down Corporation, a California Corporation, and Goose Down, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Euroquilt, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Estella Timms v. Anthony M. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- United States v. Lavabit, LLC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- In Re IFC Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Trade Well International v. United Central BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Hooper-Haas v. Ziegler Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.