Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carstens v. California Coastal Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1986No. D002237PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

August S. Carstens (Carstens) appeals the denial of his

petition for writ of mandate seeking judicial review of the California Coastal Commission’s (Commission) decision approving an amendment to a coastal development permit issued to Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric (SCE) 1 in 1974 for construction of units 2 and 3 of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). The amendment modified conditions relating to beach access in conflict with safety measures required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2 We affirm the judgment.

Factual and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Citizens for East Shore Parks v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. La Costa Beach Homeowners' Ass'n v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Baldwin v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Rohn v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Brown v. Board of County Commissioners for Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API