Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith's

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 24, 1918PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

The opinion of the Honorable William A. Moncure, judge of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond, which fol*343lows, is justified by the record and sufficiently supports the decree complained of, and therefore it will be affirmed.

“This is an extremely interesting case. William C..Smith died in the city of Baltimore in February, 1880, and on February 26, 1880, his last will and testament, which was dated May-, 1877, was probated in the Orphans Court of the city of Baltimore, and on May 13, 1880, a certified copy was duly probated and admitted to record by the Chancery Court of the city of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Tilt v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Overby v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. TisdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Conrad'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Tuells v. FlintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Davis v. KendallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. Estate of BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hoglan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API