Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1992No. 563A90PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

On appeal, defendant brings forth numerous assignments of error. We conclude that defendant’s trial was free from prejudicial error.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s failure to require recordation of various bench and chambers conferences. Prior to trial, defendant moved for complete recordation of all proceedings, specifically including motion hearings, jury selection and bench conferences. Although these motions were allowed by the trial court, it held several unrecorded bench and chambers conferences, including two chambers conferences that concerned the jury…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. ConawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. HarvellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API