Strowmatt v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Abpellant—Defendant,‘ Timothy Strow-matt (Strowmatt), appeals the denial of his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief and Motion to Correct Erroneous Sentence: 1
We affirm.
ISSUES
Strowmatt raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows: >
1; Whether the post-conviction court properly denied his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.
2. Whether the post-conviction court properly denied his Motion to Correct Eir-roneous Sentence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 2, 1994, the State filed an information against Strowmatt charging him…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Reinbold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Thomas Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Abernathy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mark M. Jervis v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Christopher Harding v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.