Legal Opinion

Strowmatt v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2002No. 71A05-0201-PC-25PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Abpellant—Defendant,‘ Timothy Strow-matt (Strowmatt), appeals the denial of his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief and Motion to Correct Erroneous Sentence: 1

We affirm.

ISSUES

Strowmatt raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows: >

1; Whether the post-conviction court properly denied his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.

2. Whether the post-conviction court properly denied his Motion to Correct Eir-roneous Sentence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 2, 1994, the State filed an information against Strowmatt charging him…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Reinbold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Thomas Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Abernathy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Mark M. Jervis v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Christopher Harding v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API