Legal Opinion

Printy v. Cahill

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District ; — heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Dock wood HonorE, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

Alice Wier Printy, as administratrix of the estate of Mary E. A. McElroy, deceased, filed a bill in the circuit court of Cook county to foreclose a mortgage for $2387, executed by Michael J. Cahill in the lifetime of Mary E. A. McElroy. Subsequently Catherine Burns, as administra-trix of the estate of J. Frank Tyrrell, was joined as complainant in the foreclosure proceeding, on the ground that her intestate was the owner of a note for $75 that was also secured by the same mortgage. Cahill answered the bill, admitting the execution of the mortgage and notes but denying that there was anything…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. TrahernIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Harding v. ShepardIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Mack v. WoodruffIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Peacock v. HavenIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Howe Machine Co. v. HickoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. BrooderWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mahon v. Harney County Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. McKeown v. PridmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Cook v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Allen v. HollemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API