Legal Opinion
Dangelo v. Farina
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 29, 1942PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
This is an action of contract to recover the agreed price of the equity of redemption in certain premises — which was also the amount due upon a note made by the defendant’s husband — which the plaintiff conveyed to the defendant in consideration of the promise of the defendant and her husband to pay the balance due on the note. The judge found for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals from an order of the Appellate Division dismissing the report.
*759There was evidence that Michael Farina, the defendant’s husband, gave the plaintiff, in 1922, a promissory note for $450; that he made various…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strong v. Haverhill Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Wilkinson v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Himelfarb v. Novadel Agene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Townsend v. HargravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Marquis v. MessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Godfrey v. CaswellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- L. Grossman Sons, Inc. v. RudderhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.