Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Leeke

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 14, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 81-1523-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAWKINS, District Judge.

The petitioner, Sarah Thomas, is a state prisoner seeking habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This action is before the court on the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). This court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Magistrate’s recommendation to which specific objection is made, and’it may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations made by the Magistrate or recommit the matter to the Magistrate with instructions.

In his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sarah Thomas v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner the Attorney General of the State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. Theodore Griffin v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney General of the State of S. C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Sarah Thomas v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner the Attorney General of the State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API