State v. Acosta
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
101 Wn.2d 612 (1984)
683 P.2d 1069
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
DAVID VELASQUEZ ACOSTA, Petitioner.
No. 49621-8.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
May 24, 1984.
William K. Thayer and Steven W. Thayer, for petitioner.
Arthur D. Curtis, Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard Melnick, Deputy, for respondent.
WILLIAMS, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether, in a prosecution for second degree assault under RCW 9A.36.020(1)(b), the State must disprove a defendant's claim of self-defense. The Court of Appeals held that the State need not do so, and affirmed petitioner's conviction. State v.…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.