Legal Opinion
Bell v. Great Lakes Container Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 11, 1985No. 62637PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAPP, Judge.
The petitioner, Vane 0. Bell, appeals from the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court holding petitioner did not sustain an accidental injury arising out of or in the course of his employment with the respondent, Great Lakes Container Corporation. Bell alleges he was denied due process of law by the reassignment of another judge and not having the same judge who heard the testimony and observe the witnesses decide the case. He also alleges error of the trial court in failing to hold that an accidental injury arose out of or in the course of his employment with the respondent.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Dana Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Grow v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Commonwealth ex rel. Dion v. TeesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grudzina v. New Mexico Youth Diagnostic & Development CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Marriage of CrosettoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Grudzina v. NM YOUTH DIAGNOSTIC & DEVELOP.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Pexa v. T.G. & Y. Northwestern National Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987