Legal Opinion

Pexa v. T.G. & Y. Northwestern National Insurance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1987No. 66549Published

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Judge:

This is a proceeding to review an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court. Petitioners allege a violation of due process and that the ruling of the trial court was not supported by competent evidence.

Frank Ungerlund, D.C. (Ungerlund) is the real party in interest. He provided the medical care to Herb C. Pexa from August 22, 1984 through April 4, 1985, for compen-sable injuries Pexa received while working for Respondent T.G. & Y. Ungerlund submitted a statement to Respondent Northwestern National Insurance Company for $2,355 for treatment to Pexa. The insurance company refused…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Dion v. TeesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Malone v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Bell v. Great Lakes Container Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. City of Stillwater v. FochtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API