Ford Motor Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, J. *
Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel respondent to set aside its order of December 18, 1970 granting the motion of real party in interest Archie Grant (hereinafter designated as Grant) to strike the sixth affirmative defense in petitioner Ford’s second amended answer (collateral estoppel) 1 and the fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth affirmative defenses (retraxit, res judicata, and collateral estoppel) in the amended answer of petitioner Murphy Lincoln-Mercury (hereinafter designated as Murphy).
For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we have determined that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Slobojan v. Western Travelers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Pianka v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Merry v. Coast Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Ellena v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gisler v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Gisler v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ellena v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977