Legal Opinion
Abbott Redmont Thinlite Corporation v. Rudolph R. Redmont and Circle Redmont Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 13, 1973No. 338, Docket 71-1565PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
The issue here presented is whether the appellees, Rudolph R. Redmont and Circle Redmont Corporation, deprived the appellant, Abbott Redmont Thinlite Corporation, of a business opportunity in which it had a “tangible expectancy,” and thereby violated Redmont’s obligations as a former officer-employee of appellant. Burg v. Horn, 380 F.2d 897, 899 (2d Cir. 1967); Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co., 293 N.Y. 281, 300, 56 N.E.2d 705, 713-14 (1944); Guth v. Loft, Inc., 23 Del.Ch. 255, 270-71, 5 A.2d 503, 510-11 (Sup.Ct.1939); see I. Hornstein, Corporation Law…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Foulke v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Lamorte Burns & Co., Inc. v. WaltersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- St. John's University, New York v. BoltonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- American Federal Group, Ltd. And Dennis A. Herman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Barnett Rothenberg, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.