In re the Detention of Reimer

¶1 Joel Reimer appeals the trial court’s decision denying his request for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he currently meets the definition of a “sexually violent predator.” The State cross-assigns error to the trial court’s ruling that RCW 71.09.090, as amended in 2005, is unconstitutional. Reimer failed to present evidence that his condition has changed so that he no longer is a “sexually violent predator” under either former or amended RCW 71.09.090. We affirm the trial court on this issue but reverse the trial court’s ruling that the amended statute is unconstitutional.

FACTS

¶2…