Legal Opinion

Russell v. Soper

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1936No. 8 Div. 671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The main purpose of the bill of complaint is to eliminate. from the bank’s mortgage a certain tract or parcel of land of 20 acres, known as “Adele Spring,” because improperly included therein. It is immaterial whether the bill be designated as one of cancellation, to quiet title, or to correct a mutual mistake, as the main purpose of same is to strike from the mortgage the said parcel of land which had been improperly included therein.

The undisputed evidence shows that it was agreed between Fussell, the president of the bank, and the mortgagor that this tract should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robins, Fry & Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Kahn v. PeterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Kinney v. La FrangeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Christian Benevolent Burial Ass'n v. HuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Russell v. First Nat. Bank of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API