Legal Opinion

Russell v. First Nat. Bank of Hartselle

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1938No. 8 Div. 802Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

•This litigation is a sequel to that of Russell v. Soper, 232 Ala. 194, 167 So. 261, and refers to the deed there described conveying the twenty acres known as the “Adele Spring” made by A. Polytinsky to his daughter Adelle P. Russell (formerly Polytinsky).

That litigation was between her and E. B. Soper as receiver appointed by the Comptroller' of Currency of the United States for the First National Bank in Decatur. So-per, as such receiver, was a party to that suit, and in the circuit court a decree was rendered in his favor as receiver whereby the deed above mentioned was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Marks v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Hunnicutt v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Ex parte Walter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API