Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Burch
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 11, 1939No. 1 Div. 40PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill was for interpléader among rival claimants for moneys seized by the Chief of Police of Mobile under legal process.
It is alleged by complainant Burch that the appellants (the banks) as administrators of the .estate of Margaret Cox, deceased, and Clara Moskowitz, one of the respondents, claimed money that Clara Moskowitz alleged complainant took from her unlawfully, and that it “was not concealed except that it was put in a trunk in a closet at (her) home;” that of such sum, $4,458.77 was paid out by complainant on, the order of the Circuit Court' of Mobile, leaving a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- McGuff v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thomas v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Porter v. JollySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Watt v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Singley v. BentleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Thompson v. SuttleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.