Legal Opinion

Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. Coleman

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1935No. 1 Div. 188PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The complaint was in two counts, both claiming damages from defendant by reason of the negligent operation of an automobile on the highways of Mobile county, at a point near defendant’s plant, by. an agent, etc., of defendant while acting within the line and scope of his employment. The point is made by demurrer that the designation of the place of the accident is too indefinite to apprize the defendant of its location. The description of the place in the complaint is: “On and along the Fulton Road, one of the public highways of the City and County of Mobile, and at a point…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Hill v. Decatur Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. WhitleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Western Railway v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Blackmon v. StarlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blair v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Hays v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Koonce v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Anderson v. Howard Hall CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API