Blackmon v. Starling
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The question presented for decision is the propriety of refusing appellant’s requested general charge.
The decisions are collected in McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40, 88 So. 135, and Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336, 77 So. 998, and the rule need not be repeated as to the giving and refusal of such charge.
It must be admitted that the map or drawing exhibited by brief of appellant was his interpretation of the evidence, rather than supplying the diagram employed in the introduction of the evidence. When the hill of exceptions is given careful consideration, the absence of such blackboard drawing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Albritton v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. ColemanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
- Terminal Transport Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Birmingham Post Co. v. MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.