Legal Opinion
Corman v. H-30 Drilling, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 21, 2002No. 94,255PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Viee Chief Justice.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
{ 1 In 1987, defendant, H 30 Drilling, Inc., was a Kansas corporation that was licensed to do business and doing business in Oklahoma. That year, H-80 drilled an oil and gas well in Woods County, Oklahoma for Plaintiff, Jack Corman. Corman held a lease to the oil and gas interests underlying the well and operated the well after its completion. In 1991 the Oklahoma Corporation Commission instituted proceedings against Corman as the well's operator to require him to clean up claimed pollution to the aquifer underlying the well,. As…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Norman v. Trison Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Luster v. Bank of ChelseaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- In re the Termination of Parental RightsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. SMITHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Williams v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Moncrieff-Yeates v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Marriage of Muller v. MullerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.