Legal Opinion
Moncrieff-Yeates v. Kane
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 15, 2013No. 111765PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
{1 The issue presented to this Court is whether the district court erred in proceeding in the foreclosure suit below after the defendant filed a motion giving notice of the plaintiff corporation's suspension in June of 2000 for failure to pay corporate franchise taxes; for the eleven months that the plaintiff was on notice that its suspension was an issue in the suit, the corporation failed to be reinstated; and title 68, section 1212(C) of the Oklahoma Statutes denies a suspended corporation the right to sue or defend. We answer in the affirmative.
I. FACTS
12 K.O.D. Enterprises, Inc. (K.0.D.)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- S.W. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- W.R. Allison Enterprises, Inc. v. CompSource OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Williams v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SANDERS v. TURN KEY HEALTH CLINICSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
- Gaedeke Holdings VII Ltd v. Stamps Brothers Oil and Gas LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- Gary Family Trust, The v. GaryDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Shotwell v. Department of Tourism and RecreationDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2025