Dykstra v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I.INTRODUCTION
The Municipality of Anchorage’s zoning board of examiners and appeals affirmed an enforcement order directing David Dykstra to stop using the area surrounding his four-plex as a storage yard for cars. Dykstra appeals, contending that collecting and storing ears is a permitted accessory use under zoning ordinances governing R-3 property; alternatively, he argues, the ordinances describing accessory uses are unconstitutionally vague. We reject Dykstra’s claim of vagueness and find ample evidence to support the board’s decision that his car collection…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lawrence v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Holton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- De Nardo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Henry v. Board of Appeals of DunstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Strane v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- State of Alaska, Department of Revenue v. Nabors International Finance, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Nabors International Finance, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. State of Alaska, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. AndyWashington Supreme Court · 2014