Legal Opinion
City of Paducah v. Ragsdale
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions
CASE 48. — PROCEEDINGS IN THE POLICE COURT OP THE CITY OP PADUCAH AGAINST S. P. RAGSDALE AND OTHERS UNDER A CITY ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CATTLE PROM RUNNING AT LARGE IN SAID CITY. — March 22. Appeal from Police Court of City of Paducah. D. L. S’aNdees, Police Judge. From the judgment the city appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION op the Court by
Judge O’Rear
— Reversing. _
This appeal is prosecuted under the provision of section 3063, Ky. Stat., 1903, from a judgment of the police court of Paducah, a city of the second class, declaring invalid the following ordinance duly enacted by the city’s legislative department:
“An ordinance to prevent certain animals of the bovine kind from running at large in the city of Paducah.
“Be it ordained by the general council of the city of Paducah, Kentucky:
“Section 1. That no cow, calf, or other animal of the bovine kind, shall be permitted to go at large upon any of the streets,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Louisville v. WehmhoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Varden v. MountCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- McKee v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- McCollom v. DollarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- State v. LapointeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
- Commonwealth v. KrogerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Board of Levee Commissioners v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- City of St. Paul v. WhidbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.