Legal Opinion

State v. Lapointe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 5, 1924PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

The section of the statute making possession of intoxicating liquor an offense, unless the liquor was lawfully procured, also provides that “the possession of any intoxicating liquor within this state shall be prima facie evidence of violation of this section.” Laws 1919, c. 99, s. 4. At the outset the question arises as to what is here intended by the words prima facie evidence. Do they mean evidence which compels a finding, in the absence of other evidence (Copp v. Henniker, 55 N. H. 179, 205), or was it the purpose to make such evidence sufficient to invoke the judgment of the jury (State…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. People v. . CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. State v. LarochelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  3. Stoneham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. State v. MilletteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Roy Lee Barrett, Jackie Hamilton Gainey and Cleveland Johns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API