Commonwealth v. Lightfoot
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*352 OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
ZAPPALA, Justice.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to charge the jury on the defense of entrapment. Our examination of the entire record persuades us that the court did so err, and thus we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for new trial. 428 Pa.Super. 638, 627 A.2d 203.
Curtis Lightfoot was charged with possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, delivery of a controlled substance, and criminal conspiracy. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WeiskergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BuksaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. DemarcoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Gnacinski, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.