Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Demarco

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 2002No. Criminal 192-1999PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Justice NIGRO.

We granted allowance of appeal in the instant case to review whether the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County committed reversible error during the trial of Appellant Richard DeMarco by refusing to charge the jury on the defense of duress. For the reasons that follow, we find that the trial court did err, and therefore, vacate Appellant’s judgment of sentence and remand the case to the trial court for a new trial.

On February 16, 1998, Frank Larwa called the Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department to report that Salvatore Zarcone was at his home in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Von Der Heide v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CharlestonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. HairstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. GalvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API