Legal Opinion
Agee v. Rhodes
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 7, 1917No. 8055PublishedCited by 4 opinions
■ Complaint; from Warren superior court—Judge Walker. January 22,1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeth, J.
1. Grounds of a motion for new trial not specifically urged in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error will be considered to . have been abandoned. “Courts of review have the right to expect assistance from counsel by citation of authority or argument, and will . be apt to accept the inference that the lack of interest by counsel is due to a conviction of the lack of merit.” Youmans v. Moore, 11 Ga. App. 66 (4) (74 S. E. 710); Muse v. Hall, 18 Ga. App. 651. (3) (90 S. E. 222); Jefferson v. Perry, 18 Ga. App. 690 (3) (90 S. E. 366).
2. The court charged the jury: .“If you find that J. P.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sutton v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Youmans v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Muse v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Harris v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Jefferson v. City of PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Few v. PouCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- First National Bank v. MacDougald Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Phinazee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Cluff v. Merchants & Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929