Legal Opinion

Cluff v. Merchants & Mechanics Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 24, 1929No. 19334PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, R. J.

1. While ordinarily, before a laborer’s lien can be foreclosed, the laborer must have fully completed the contract, yet where he is prevented from doing so by the other party to the contract the actual completion of the contract is not necessary. Ballard v. Daniel, 18 Ga. App. 449 (89 S. E. 603); Payne v. Trammell, 29 Ga. App. 475 (115 S. E. 923). Thus, where before the end of the year for which a farm laborer was -employed, but after the maturity of the crops, the landlord turned the crops over to a third person, his creditor, to be gathered by that person, it was not necessary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sutton v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Few v. PouCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Harris v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Ballard v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Forbes v. Chisholm & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Little v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API