Legal Opinion

Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 23, 1988No. 22877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Judge:

Appellant Steven W. Hamm, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina, appeals the circuit court’s decision affirming a rate order issued by the South Carolina Public Service Commission (Commission), which granted Piedmont Natural Gas Company (Piedmont) an increase in revenues for its gas operations. We vacate the decision of the circuit court and remand this case to the Commission to substantiate the record and include in its order the basis for the adoption and approval of the use of retention factors.

On May 30, 1986, Piedmont filed an application with the Commission to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Able Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Parker v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Brown v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Southern Development Land & Golf Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthorityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Piedmont Natural Gas Co. v. HammSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API