Legal Opinion

Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 1989No. 23022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant (Consumer Advocate) appeals two orders of the South Carolina Public Service Commission (the PSC) granting South Carolina Electric and Gas’s (SCE&G’s) application for certain accounting adjustments relative to its rate base. We vacate and remand.

FACTS

In Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service Com’n, 294 S. C. 320, 364 S. E. (2d) 455 (1988) (Hamm I), this Court approved the PSC’s method of valuing excess generating capacity for purposes of “phasing-in” the cost of the new V.C. Summer Nuclear Station. In Hamm I, the PSC excluded 400 MW (megawatts) of SCE&G’s generating capacity from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Able Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Patton v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Parker v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Hill v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Moore v. South Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Moore v. South Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API