Piedmont Natural Gas Co. v. Hamm
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellant Steven W. Hamm (consumer advocate) appeals the circuit court’s order directing respondent South Carolina Public Service Commission (Commission) to reopen the record in this case for the purpose of taking additional evidence to support the Commission’s prior approval of Piedmont Natural Gas Company’s (Piedmont) use of a retention factor to compute revenues. We reverse.
I. FACTS
On May 30, 1986, Piedmont filed an application with the Commission to increase certain rates and charges for its retail gas service. At the public hearing on that application, Piedmont asserted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parker v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Parker v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003