Freimann v. Cumming

No question is raised but that this par-, ticular building is a public building within the purview of the safe-place statute here invoked and as defined in sub. (12), sec. 101.01, Stats. Unless, however, the defendant Cumming is within the definition of the word “owner” as the same is used in the same law, it is conceded there can be no recovery as against him.

The material part of the statute upon which plaintiff predicates her right to recover as against respondent is found in *90sub. (13),' sec. 101.01, providing that the term “owner” shall mean and include every person “having otvnership,…