Legal Opinion
Fleming v. United Services Automobile Assn.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1999No. CC 9312-08128; CA A86826; SC S44805PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
The issue in this case is whether plaintiff is entitled to insurance coverage for loss to his property caused by the clandestine operation of an illegal methamphetamine laboratory. A jury found that plaintiff was entitled to coverage. The Court of Appeals reversed. Fleming v. United Services Automobile Assn., 144 Or App 1, 925 P2d 140 (1996). We allowed plaintiffs petition for review. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
The facts are not contested. Plaintiff Terry Fleming and his wife own a 55 percent interest in residential rental…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Dickinson v. LeerOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. MowryOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, an Indiana Corporation v. West Oregon Wood Products, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Parks v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.